This is kinda/sorta a followup to my Presumptive Nominee post. Hugh Hewitt wrote an interesting piece entitled The Torricelli Option: Will Dems Dump Kerry?
Dems know he's a loser. But can anything be done?So how exactly would the Torricelli Option work? Short of trumping up some outlandish criminal charges agaist Kerry that is. Either Kerry will have to fall on his own figurative sword (ignominiously withdrawing) like the Torch did, or the Powers That Be in the Democrat party will have to somehow force through some rules changes at the convention, allowing the delegates to vote freely on the first ballot.Who knows? Don't bother looking up the rules governing nominations. There were rules in Florida, and the Florida Supreme Court tore those up when Gore needed help. There were rules in New Jersey, but when Torricelli flamed, the New Jersey Supreme Court tossed those aside. There were rules in California, and three judges ordered a halt to the recall that only went forward because the luck of an en banc draw brought sanity to the review panel.
I just don't see someone with Kerry's ego dropping out on his own accord. "Defeating George Bush is the most important goal for Democrats, urrr, I mean the country. I realize now that I am inadequate to the task, so therefore I will not accept the nomination, for the good of the party, urrr, I mean country." I don't think even J.K. Rowlings could make that scenario plausible.
So we're left with a rules change prior to / during the convention. Who within the party establishment would have the chutzpah to make the call? Certainly not Terry McAulliffe, since it would show what a blunder his front-loaded primary plan was.
Hillary can't do it either, since it would appear that she's after the nomination. That would be just too blatantly venal even for her.
From Hewitt's piece:
And Dean – what's he thinking when he can get the voices to quiet down? He was robbed, you know ... by the same people now conspiring against Kerry. Dean doesn't forget, and there's not enough Ambien in America to get him a night's sleep. What if, with another yell, he decides to demand an open convention. "Let the delegates vote!" isn't a bad slogan. Bring back all the orange hats and the blog and all that. Quite a party could be had by all.That smells of possibility, if it could be turned into a groundswell during the convention.
I know, this is just wild speculation. Most likely, the calls for Kerry's ouster will die down over the next month.
Posted by at April 29, 2004 01:07 PMI got it...no really...
Kerry defaults by eloping with Hillary, then Dean reorganizes the Deaniacs and they take over the convention (AAARRRGGGHHH), Clinton, miffed at the loss of his tax deduction and the takeover of the party by the Dean wing, forms an alliance with Clark who brings all his fellow ex-army types to retake the convention. After all the commotion dies down, Kucinich is the only one standing (being the shortest of the bunch most of the damage occurred over his head) and wins the nomination unopposed. Theresa, miffed at the loss of her tax deduction, joins Kucinich on the ticket.
Kucinich/Kerry in '04 "The 57th way to win the nomination"
Posted by: Ron on April 29, 2004 03:04 PMThere is no statute of limitations on war crimes. If evidence can be found as he himself once claimed that he participated in war crimes, they have their excuse ready-made.
Posted by: Dave Schuler on April 29, 2004 03:55 PMDon't forget that there was talk of dumping Clinton in '92. Didn't happen. Doubt if it will here. Too complicated, too hard to sort/predict winners/losers. Politicians that know how to make it work are too cautious and those who aren't cautious are mostly amateurs. So -- no dump.
Posted by: JorgXMcKie on April 29, 2004 05:45 PMThe only problems with the Dean theory is that Dean is liked by even fewer democrats than Kerry. The only real difference between Dean and Kerry is that Dean's supporters are a lot more passionate about their guy.
The key is the undecided 10% in the middle. I think Kerry's incoherence make it extremely hard for him to win their vote. But they're even less likely to vote for Dean.
Posted by: Fredrik Nyman on April 30, 2004 08:33 AMThe other problem with Dean is that they are offering him a syndicated talk show and odds are pretty good he'll accept.
I can't wait.
Posted by: Glenn on April 30, 2004 09:00 AM"However, Senator Kerry has a perfectly good potential reason for withdrawal. He is, let us not forget, a cancer survivor. A cancer survivor who has not made public his medical records."
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=3532
Posted by: Caleb on May 8, 2004 01:05 AM